Market commentary, Noticias recientes, Perspectivas regionales

Los resultados de las elecciones británicas, un primer análisis

9 June 2017 -

El partido conservador se queda a las puertas de conseguir una mayoría para las negociaciones del Brexit  

On 18 April, UK prime minister Theresa May unexpectedly called a snap general election for 8 June with the intention of gaining an enhanced majority to strengthen her hand in the upcoming Brexit negotiations with the EU. At that time, opinion polls suggested the opposition Labour party was far behind the ruling Conservatives.

On 8 June, however, Mrs. May wound up losing her majority in the House of Commons. Strikingly, Labour gained around 40% of the vote and came in second, returning England to two-party politics. The Conservatives may have won just enough seats to be able to stay in power, although they would need the support of the DUP, the major Unionist party in Northern Ireland. It is unclear whether Theresa May will remain as Prime Minister.

Parliamentary arithmetic

A party needs to win 326 seats to guarantee an absolute majority in the House and the Conservative Party has fallen just short of that mark. If the party wants to remain in power, then the only viable partner would be the DUP, although a formal coalition is unlikely. It is not clear that such an arrangement has a lot of staying power or the capacity to pass any controversial legislation, so another election in the not so distant future looks quite likely to us.

The future of Theresa May

The result will be seen as a personal defeat for Mrs May. Having run a disastrous election campaign, there will be a lot of pressure on her to resign. In all likelihood she will spend the next 24 hours sounding out key figures within the party to establish whether she has their support to carry on, at least for the short run. However, it will be difficult for the Conservatives to form a government and strike a back-room deal with the DUP and begin the Brexit negotiations if there is a vacuum at the top and party policy is being debated in a leadership contest. It is worth keeping in mind that any leadership contest is likely to see a Eurosceptic elected Prime Minister.

Implications for Brexit

The kneejerk reaction to the general election result is that ‘soft Brexit’ is back on the agenda. The country did not give Mrs. May a mandate to pursue her hard-line strategy. Indeed, one of the areas in which the DUP is likely to extract concessions from the Conservative Party is over the Brexit negotiations, where the Unionists will push for a softer deal and in particular the least disruptive outcome on the vital political question of the land border between North and South.

In fact, it is hard to see how a hard Brexit deal would pass the House of Commons. However, there is one major sticking point. Can Mrs. May or any potential successor reboot the strategy on Brexit and sell a soft Brexit deal in the Conservative Party, with all the compromises on migration and the European Court of Justice that are anathema to many of her backbenchers?  It is not clear how this tension will be resolved with the Brexit negotiations due to start in a matter of days.

Written 9 June 2017

Sobre el mismo tema:

19 December 2017

Mensual de asignación de activos Diciembre de 2017

RESUMEN : La renta variable de EE.UU. y Japón lidera la subida en noviembre mientras que Europa y los emergentes se quedan atrás / El impulso cíclico continúa en la Eurozona y en EE.UU. / La inflación sigue débil en el mundo desarrollado / La UE y el Reino Unido acuerdan las condiciones del Brexit pero el PIB no remonta.

Weekly strategy update
30 November 2017

“Ricitos de Oro” sigue sosteniendo a los activos de riesgo

Los PMI de EE. UU. y de la Eurozona potencian sus perspectivas de crecimiento; Reino Unido es la excepción

19 October 2017

Los mercados evitan enredarse a toda costa, bueno para Ricitos de Oro

Recortada la operación en IBEX/MIB por la incertidumbre sobre Cataluña

Trimestral de asignación de activos – Abril 2018

RESUMEN: Cuatro elementos han agitado los mercados y la volatilidad de la renta variable en el 1T. (i) la preocupación por la inflación y la menor flexibilización de los bancos centrales, (ii) la escalada del proteccionismo comercial, (iii) datos de actividad económica decepcionantes, especialmente en Europa; y (iv) más riesgo de regulación severa en el sector tecnológico de EE. UU. / Tras el repunte de enero, las preocupaciones por la inflación provocaron la corrección de febrero, que se magnificó por factores técnicos. / El proteccionismo aumenta: La administración Trump pilló a los mercados desprevenidos con nuevos aranceles a los bienes chinos. Creemos que la probabilidad de una escalada significativa sigue siendo baja. / Los datos de actividad no estuvieron a la altura de lo esperado por el mercado, especialmente en Europa, pero los fundamentales siguen siendo robustos y no prevemos un cambio de ciclo a corto plazo. Esta situación junto a la inflación que sigue contenida refuerza nuestra visión macroeconómica positiva para la renta variable. / El sector tecnológico ha sido el motor que ha propiciado la revalorización de la renta variable de EE. UU. en los últimos años. Ahora los inversores están reevaluando este liderazgo, ya que algunos gigantes tecnológicos se enfrentan a regulaciones más estrictas.

Compartir esta página: